August 23, 2015 Poetry

so much depends upon

So much depends

upon

a full red

pen

carving fat

away

from useful

words


I used to want poetry to be enormous, euphonic, entities dripping with imagery. Just full of words like Byron or Shakespeare or Eliot.

The way in which I write has changed so much in the last few years that I’m sort of confused, sort of _be_mused by it. I have become ruthless with editing. It may take an attempt or two to notice a stanza should be deleted or a comma added but I try to pair downeverything as far as possible.

I used to hate stark poetry. Poems like William Carlos Williams’ The Red Wheelbarrow drove me batty.

How can something so bare mean so much?

And I find myself trying desperately to emulate this directness in writing more and more.

I think I understand why, maybe a little. Fewer words, less imagery, and simpler sentences offer less room for error in communicating a poem’s intent while allowing more room for the reader’s interpretation.

Simpler structure begets greater accessibility begets more meaning.


Reply via Mastodon or Bluesky

Previous post
Toothless Brain Puppy Just an interlude here. A brief moment for you to better understand a little of how my mind works. I strive to do a few things everyday, besides
Next post
Self-evaluation Brain like a jello salad served front and center at a Midwestern family cookout. Sweet and gelatinous until you inevitably confront the one sour